Thinking Activity


    The Greatest Elizabethan Drama


 This blog is a part of Thinking Activity of Unit 1: History of English Literature: Chaucer to Shakespeare assigned by Dr.  Prof. Dilip Barad where he has give us 6 points to ponder our thinking on The Elizabethen Era and most importantly the drama of the era and great dramatists like Shakespeare and Marlowe's works.

1. Rewriting the Last Monologue of Doctor Faustus with Insights from Bhagat Singh’s Arguments.Reflect on the concluding monologue of Marlowe’s ' incorporating insights from Bhagat Singh’s essay "Why I am an Atheist".


DOCTOR FAUSTUS (Last Monologue):

Ah, Faustus,

Now hast thou but one bare hour to live,

And then thou must be damned perpetually!

Stand still, you ever-moving spheres of heaven,

That time may cease, and midnight never come;

Fair Nature's eye, rise, rise again, and make

Perpetual day; or let this hour be but

A year, a month, a week, a natural day,

That Faustus may repent and save his soul!

O lente, lente currite noctis equi! (Latin: “Run slowly, slowly, horses of the night”)

The stars move still, time runs, the clock will strike,

The devil will come, and Faustus must be damned.

O I'll leap up to my God!—Who pulls me down?—

See, see where Christ's blood streams in the firmament!

One drop would save my soul, half a drop: ah, my Christ!—

Ah, rend not my heart for naming of my Christ!

Yet will I call on him: O, spare me, Lucifer!—

Where is it now? 'tis gone: and see where God

Stretcheth out his arm, and bends his ireful brows!

Mountains and hills, come, come and fall on me,

And hide me from the heavy wrath of God!

No, no!

Then will I headlong run into the earth:

Earth, gape! O, no, it will not harbour me!

You stars that reigned at my nativity,

Whose influence hath allotted death and hell,

Now draw up Faustus like a foggy mist

Into the entrails of yon labouring cloud,

That, when you vomit forth into the air,

My limbs may issue from your smoky mouths,

So that my soul may but ascend to heaven.

[The clock strikes twelve.]

O, it strikes, it strikes! Now, body, turn to air,

Or Lucifer will bear thee quick to hell.

O soul, be changed into little water-drops,

And fall into the ocean, ne'er be found!

Thunder and lightning.

My God, my God, look not so fierce on me!

Adders and serpents, let me breathe awhile!

Ugly hell, gape not! Come not, Lucifer!

I'll burn my books!—Ah, Mephistophilis!


Bhagat Singh’s Arguments on "Why I am an Atheist?"






Bhagat Singh explicitly states that he totally rejects the existence of an Omnipresent, all-powerful, all-knowing God


• Reasons for Atheism 

1. His atheism is not driven by arrogance, pride, or vanity. He does not consider himself a demi-god, prophet, or God.

2. Motivation for Sacrifice and Lack of Selfish 

3.Critique of Challenging Old Beliefs and Faith

4. Preference for Reason over Mysticism and Blind Belief

5. Importance of Criticism and Rigorous Reasoning

6. Rejection of Prayer for Self-Preservation

7. Political implications 


Reflections Of Bhagat Singh's essay "Why I am an Atheist" incorporating into Dr. Faustus By Marlowe:


  • When reflecting on Doctor Faustus's concluding monologue through the lens of Bhagat Singh's arguments in "Why I Am an Atheist," several striking insights emerge, particularly regarding freedomoppression, and the role of reason versus blind belief. While the monologue itself is not provided, its essence – a final lament of despair, regret, and the terror of damnation – allows for a rich comparison with Singh's philosophical stance-

  • When reflecting on Doctor Faustus's concluding monologue through the lens of Bhagat Singh's arguments in "Why I Am an Atheist," several striking insights emerge, particularly regarding freedomoppression, and the role of reason versus blind belief. While the monologue itself is not provided, its essence – a final lament of despair, regret, and the terror of damnation – allows for a rich comparison with Singh's philosophical stance-


  • Faustus's monologue often includes a desperate, last-minute plea for mercy, a turning to divine power in his final hour. Bhagat Singh, however, firmly states that he would never pray for "petty selfish motives," considering it "an act of degradation and demoralisation". He explicitly rejected his friend's suggestion that he would turn to belief in his last days. 
  • From Singh's viewpoint, Faustus's desperate prayer would be seen as a demeaning act, driven by fear and self-preservation rather than any genuine conviction, a stark contrast to Singh's principled stand against such self-serving appeals.
3.Human Agency and Opposition to Oppression vs. Faustus's Self-Imposed Servitude

  • Bhagat Singh strongly believed that oppression is not divinely ordained but a result of human inaction and apathy. He asserted that British rule exists "not because God willed it but for the reason that we lack the will and courage to oppose it" and is maintained by "the force of guns and bullets... and above all because of our apathy".

  • Faustus's lament can be seen as a recognition of his own self-imposed oppression, having willingly entered a contract that stripped him of his freedom and agency. From Singh's perspective, Faustus, despite his intellect, lacked the "will and courage to oppose" the demonic dominion he invited upon himself. He did not apply "criticism" to the "old beliefs" (or newly adopted dark beliefs) that led to his downfall, but instead succumbed to them without true understanding or the will to break free through rational means.


FAUSTUS (as Bhagat Singh):

Midnight approaches.
And with it, the moment men fear most—
Not for death itself,
But for what they imagine beyond it.
But I do not tremble.
What is death but the natural conclusion
Of a life consciously lived?
I have no god to beg.
No heaven to bribe.
No hell to dread.
Let priests chant.
Let cowards fold their hands and call it faith.
But I—
I stand firm.
When I sought knowledge,
They warned me of sin.
When I questioned dogma,
They promised fire.
When I rejected their God,
They called me damned.
Yet here I am—at the end.
And still, no divine voice.
No cosmic judgment.
Only the ticking clock,
And the certainty of my thoughts.
Should I repent now?
Should I fall on my knees
To an entity I never found,
To a being whose silence
Has answered every prayer of the poor?
No.
That would be betrayal.
Not just of reason,
But of integrity.
I do not believe because I do not fear.
And I do not fear because I understand.
Death is real.
God is not.
Let others barter with imaginary heavens.
I have lived free—
And I shall die free.
Let the body perish.
Let memory fade.
But let the truth of my life remain:
That I chose to think,
When it was easier to obey.
That I chose to doubt,
When it was safer to believe.
So come, death.
I do not curse you.
You are not punishment—
You are release.
I go not to paradise, nor to perdition,
But to rest—without myth, without fear,
And above all,
Without regrets.



2. Comparative Analysis: Chaucer, Spenser, and Shakespeare


1. Historical Context and Place in the Literary Canon


Poet Period Key Work(s) Language Stage


Chaucer Late 14th century (Middle English) The Canterbury Tales Middle English

Spenser Late 16th century (Elizabethan) The Faerie Queene Early Modern English

Shakespeare Late 16th–early 17th century Sonnets, Venus and Adonis, The Rape of Lucrece Early Modern English



2. Poetic Style


Element Chaucer Spenser Shakespeare


Verse Form Iambic pentameter, rhymed couplets (heroic couplets) Spenserian stanza (ababbcbcc) Iambic pentameter (blank verse and rhyme), sonnet form

Language Rich, earthy Middle English with regional variation Archaic, consciously modeled on Chaucer and classical epics Lyrical, expressive, versatile—ranging from courtly to colloquial

Imagery & Symbolism Allegorical but grounded in realism Dense allegory and idealism Deep psychological insight, rich metaphor and imagery

Innovation Introduced vernacular English for serious poetry Invented the Spenserian stanza Mastered and popularized the English sonnet




3. Themes


Themes Chaucer Spenser Shakespeare


Human Nature Satirical, ironic view of society and clergy Moral and spiritual allegory Complex exploration of love, power, time, identity

Religion & Morality Critiques of religious hypocrisy, social corruption Protestant ethics, Christian virtue, chivalry Often ambiguous; spiritual reflection in sonnets

Love & Desire Realistic, sometimes bawdy Courtly and idealized Ranges from idealized to cynical

Politics & Nation Early interest in English society Nationalism, virtue as a civilizing force Monarchic power, nationhood subtly addressed



     4. Contributions to English Literature


Contribution Chaucer Spenser Shakespeare


Father of English Poetry Elevated English as a literary language Created a national epic in English Shaped modern English literary and dramatic expression

Characterization First major English author to deeply characterize diverse social types Less focused on realism; emphasizes idealized characters Psychological depth unmatched in English poetry and drama

Form & Structure Pilgrimage frame narrative in The Canterbury Tales Extended allegorical epic in The Faerie Queene Perfected the sonnet; used verse in drama innovatively

Literary Legacy Influenced Spenser, Milton, and others Directly influenced Milton and Romantic poets Inspired poets across ages: Keats, Eliot, Auden, and beyond


5. Influence on Subsequent Traditions

Chaucer:

Laid the foundation for vernacular English poetry.

Inspired the use of frame narrative and irony.

Influenced 15th-century Scottish poets (e.g., Dunbar, Henryson) and later Spenser and Dryden.

Spenser:

Modeled epic poetry with a Protestant-nationalist flavor.

Inspired Milton’s Paradise Lost and English romantic allegorists.

His use of archaic language shaped a tradition of deliberate poetic “elevation.”


Shakespeare:

Set the standard for poetic language in both dramatic and lyric forms.

His sonnets influenced countless poets including Keats, Browning, and Eliot.

His integration of poetic structure into drama redefined English literature.

Conclusion

While Chaucer, Spenser, and Shakespeare all contributed significantly to English poetry, their distinct styles and purposes shaped very different literary paths:

Chaucer represents the birth of English literary tradition, grounded in social observation and humor.

Spenser crafted a consciously moral and epic poetic identity, steeped in allegory and nationalism.

Shakespeare elevated poetry to an emotional and philosophical high, blending drama with lyricism and insight into human nature.


Together, they form a continuum of English poetic evolution — from narrative and allegory to lyric and dramatic mastery.


3. Review of a Film on the Elizabethan/Shakespearean Era :- 


๐ŸŽฌ Film Review: Shakespeare in Love (1998)


Director: John Madden

Stars: Joseph Fiennes, Gwyneth Paltrow, Geoffrey Rush, Judi Dench, Colin Firth, Ben Affleck

Genre: Period romantic comedy

Setting: London, 1593—Elizabethan era during the writing of Romeo and Juliet 


Plot & Style


This fanciful imagining of Shakespeare’s life infuses star-crossed romance into the realpolitik of Elizabeth’s theatrical world. Viola de Lesseps inspires the blocked playwright William Shakespeare to craft Romeo and Juliet, while navigating censorship, court intrigue, and gender disguise. The film gleams with sumptuous period costumes, witty dialogue, and a clever love‑story that entwines with dramatic literary creation.

Critic & Audience Reception


The film earned widespread acclaim and box‑office success—grossing over $289M globally, and lauded for its clever screenplay and romantic zest.  


๐Ÿ† Which Is the Best Film Adaptation of Shakespeare?


1. Ran (1985) - Akira Kurosawa: This epic film reimagines King Lear in feudal Japan, using breathtaking visuals and powerful performances to convey the themes of betrayal, family conflict, and the consequences of power. 

2. Hamlet (1996) - Kenneth Branagh: Branagh's Hamlet is celebrated for its completeness, capturing the full scope of the play with a strong cast and meticulous attention to detail. 

3. Romeo and Juliet (1968) - Franco Zeffirelli: This adaptation stands out for its youthful and passionate portrayal of the star-crossed lovers, using young, relatively unknown actors to bring a sense of immediacy and realism to the story. 

4. Romeo + Juliet (1996) - Baz Luhrmann: This visually striking and modern adaptation sets the play in a contemporary, stylized world, breathing new life into the classic story and making it accessible to a new generation. 

5. Henry V (1989) - Kenneth Branagh: Branagh's Henry V is praised for its epic scope and powerful depiction of the English king's military campaigns and personal struggles. 

6. Macbeth (2015) - Justin Kurzel: This adaptation, starring Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard, is known for its dark, atmospheric visuals and intense performances. 

7. Much Ado About Nothing (1993) - Kenneth Branagh: Branagh's adaptation of this comedic play is lauded for its wit, charm, and strong ensemble cast. 

8. Titus (1999) - Julie Taymor: This visually stunning adaptation of Titus Andronicus is known for its surreal and visceral approach, making the play's violence and brutality strikingly impactful. 

9. Chimes at Midnight (1965) - Orson Welles: This adaptation, combining elements of several Shakespearean plays, is a powerful and complex exploration of power, loyalty, and the passage of time. 

10. The Tragedy of Macbeth (2021) - Joel Coen: This black and white adaptation, starring Denzel Washington and Frances McDormand, is praised for its minimalist aesthetic and powerful performances.

๐ŸŽฅ Are Hindi Adaptation ?

Vishal Bhardwaj’s Maqbool (2003) (Macbeth) and Omkara (2006) (Othello) are widely acclaimed. 



Omkara, in particular, is frequently praised as Bhardwaj’s best, translating themes of jealousy, caste, and betrayal into rural Uttar Pradesh with urgency and authenticity.  



Maqbool is often cited as one of the strongest non-Western Shakespeare adaptations—the grittiness and cultural translation are hauntingly effective.  




Haider (2014), directed by Vishal Bhardwaj, reimagines Hamlet in the context of the Kashmir insurgency of the 1990s. The film stars Shahid Kapoor as Haider, Tabu as his mother (Ghazala), and Kay Kay Menon as his uncle (Khurram).



Haider (2014), directed by Vishal Bhardwaj, reimagines Hamlet in the context of the Kashmir insurgency of the 1990s. The film stars Shahid Kapoor as Haider, Tabu as his mother (Ghazala), and Kay Kay Menon as his uncle (Khurram). 

Many global “Top Shakespeare” articles (e.g. Forbes, Talk Film Society) now include these Hindi adaptations among their best films based on Shakespeare’s works.  


4. Best Bollywood Adaptations of ShakespeareExplore the best Bollywood adaptations of Shakespeare’s works, Which has interpret and transform the original plays for an Indian audience.



1. Maqbool (2003) — Adaptation of Macbeth



Director: Vishal Bhardwaj

Cast: Irrfan Khan, Tabu, Pankaj Kapur


How it adapts the original:


Set in the Mumbai underworld, Maqbool reinterprets Macbeth’s ambition and guilt in the context of gang wars and power struggles.


The witches are replaced by two corrupt policemen who speak in riddles, foreshadowing doom.


Tabu’s character, Nimmi (Lady Macbeth), is a powerful influence, urging Maqbool toward murder and madness.



Cultural Transformation:


The feudal, royal court politics of Macbeth is transposed into crime syndicate dynamics.


Indian superstitions, loyalty codes, and the moral complexities of karma are woven in.



2. Omkara (2006) — Adaptation of Othello


Director: Vishal Bhardwaj

Cast: Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan


How it adapts the original:


Omkara shifts Othello’s jealousy and betrayal to the backdrop of Indian caste politics and rural crime lords in Uttar Pradesh.


Saif Ali Khan’s Langda Tyagi is a Hindi-speaking Iago, cunning and venomous.


The tragic downfall is framed through Indian power structures, caste prejudice, and machismo.



Cultural Transformation:


Instead of a foreigner, Omkara is a lower-caste enforcer — his insecurities come from caste discrimination rather than race.


Dialogues in rustic dialects and folk music heighten the authenticity.



3. Haider (2014) — Adaptation of Hamlet


Director: Vishal Bhardwaj

Cast: Shahid Kapoor, Tabu, Kay Kay Menon


How it adapts the original:


Set in conflict-ridden Kashmir in the 1990s, Haider mirrors Hamlet’s quest for revenge with the larger political instability.


Haider’s uncle is a government informant, adding new depth to Claudius’s betrayal.


The famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy becomes a powerful monologue on identity and violence.



Cultural Transformation:


The play’s introspection becomes a meditation on insurgency, disappearance, and state violence.


Tabu’s portrayal of Gertrude (Ghazaala) is given more emotional depth and agency in the Indian context.



4. 10ml LOVE (2010) — Adaptation of A Midsummer Night’s Dream



Director: Sharat Katariya

Cast: Rajat Kapoor, Tisca Chopra, Purab Kohli


How it adapts the original:


A lighter romantic comedy version, this film keeps the magical confusion of love intact, using a love potion mix-up in a modern urban Indian setting.


It balances the whimsical tone with middle-class dilemmas.


Cultural Transformation:


Shakespeare’s forest becomes a chaotic, almost dreamlike Indian urban jungle.


The myth and magic are stylized with humor rooted in Indian familial and romantic quirks.



Conclusion:


These adaptations do not simply retell Shakespeare; they transform his themes—ambition, jealousy, love, revenge—into deeply Indian narratives. Vishal Bhardwaj, in particular, has created a modern Shakespearean trilogy that blends the bard’s universality with local context, making his works accessible and relevant for Indian audiences.


5. Differentiating Literary PeriodsDifferentiate the general characteristics of Renaissance literature from those of other literary periods such as the Reformation, Restoration, Neo-classical, Romantic, Victorian, and Modern literature. Highlight the unique features, themes, and stylistic elements of each period


๐Ÿ› 1. Renaissance Literature (c. 1500–1660)


Core Traits:


Revival of Classical Greek and Roman ideals


Emphasis on humanism – focus on human potential, reason, and individual dignity


Exploration of beauty, nature, and love


Blending of secular and religious ideas


Flourishing of drama and poetry


Key Figures: William Shakespeare, Edmund Spenser, Christopher Marlowe, John Donne


Stylistic Features:

Blank verse, sonnets, metaphysical poetry


Use of allegory, classical allusions, and elaborate metaphors



✝️ 2. Reformation Literature (c. 1517–1600s)


Core Traits:


Religious reform themes — critique of the Catholic Church


Promotion of biblical literacy and vernacular translations


Rise of protestant writing and pamphleteering


Key Figures: Martin Luther, John Calvin, William Tyndale


Stylistic Features:


Polemical texts, sermons, theological tracts


Plain, direct prose style for accessibility


๐Ÿ‘‘ 3. Restoration Literature (1660–1700)


Core Traits:


Return of monarchy influences themes of social order and hierarchy


Rise of satire and comedy of manners


Cynicism and realism in response to Puritanism


Key Figures: John Dryden, Aphra Behn, William Congreve


Stylistic Features:


Witty dialogue, heroic couplets


Interest in sexual politics and urban life


๐Ÿ›๐Ÿ“š 4. Neoclassical Literature (c. 1700–1798)


Core Traits:


Emphasis on reason, logic, order, and decorum


Inspiration from Classical antiquity


Literature as a tool for moral instruction



Key Figures: 

Alexander Pope, Jonathan Swift, Samuel Johnson


Stylistic Features:


Satire, essays, rhymed verse, polished prose


Emphasis on form and harmony


๐ŸŒฟ 5. Romantic Literature (1798–1837)

Core Traits:


Celebration of emotion, nature, individualism


Rebellion against industrialism and Neoclassicism


Fascination with the supernatural, childhood, and imagination


Key Figures: William Wordsworth, Samuel Coleridge, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Mary Shelley, Keats, Byron


Stylistic Features:


Lyrical poetry, subjective tone


Use of symbolism, nature imagery, dramatic monologues


๐Ÿ•ฐ 6. Victorian Literature (1837–1901)

Core Traits:


Focus on morality, social reform, industrialization, class conflict


Interest in science vs. religion, gender roles, and realism


Expansion of the novel as dominant form


Key Figures: Charles Dickens, Alfred Lord Tennyson, Thomas Hardy, George Eliot, the Brontรซs


Stylistic Features:


Long, descriptive prose


Omniscient narrators, detailed character studies


๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿง  7. Modern Literature (c. 1900–1945)

Core Traits:


Reaction to World Wars, alienation, fragmentation


Experimental forms and stream of consciousness


Themes of existentialism, disillusionment, identity crisis.


Key Figures: T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, Franz Kafka, D.H. Lawrence


Stylistic Features:


Nonlinear narratives, ambiguous endings


Symbolism, irony, inner monologue


6. Review of a Hindi Film Adaptation of Shakespearean Plays or the Elizabethan Era
how the adaptation retains the essence of the original play while infusing it with cultural and contextual elements relevant to Indian cinema.


๐ŸŽญ From Stratford to Small-Town India: A Review of Vishal Bhardwaj’s Omkara


A Hindi Film Adaptation of Shakespeare's Othello


When William Shakespeare penned Othello in the early 1600s, he may not have imagined his tragic Moor would one day emerge as a small-town gangster in Uttar Pradesh, India. But that's precisely what director Vishal Bhardwaj accomplishes in Omkara (2006), a masterful Hindi adaptation that fuses Shakespearean tragedy with the raw textures of Indian hinterland politics.


๐ŸŽฌ The Plot, Reimagined


Omkara retells the story of Othello, with Omkara (Ajay Devgn) as a politically backed enforcer in a lawless, caste-conscious landscape. He elopes with Dolly (Kareena Kapoor), the Desdemona equivalent, but is manipulated into believing she has been unfaithful. The cunning Langda Tyagi (Saif Ali Khan), inspired by Iago, is the driving force behind the lies and paranoia.


 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณCultural Translation: Shakespeare Meets Desi Soil


Rather than replicate Elizabethan drama in a historical setting, Bhardwaj roots the film in modern Indian politics. Here’s how the adaptation stays true to Shakespeare yet deeply Indianizes the narrative:


Caste replaces race: In Othello, the protagonist’s racial difference causes societal tension. In Omkara, caste becomes the source of alienation — a powerful commentary on India’s socio-political fabric.


Rural dialects and earthy language: The dialogues are crafted in local Hindi dialects, adding authenticity and richness. Shakespeare’s poetic rhetoric finds a new home in rustic idioms and sharp satire.


Political ambition replaces military hierarchy: Omkara isn't a military general, but a political strongman — a more relatable power figure in Indian society.


Music and folk culture: Songs like “Beedi” and “Naina Thag Lenge” are not just entertainment—they underscore themes of seduction, betrayal, and fate, much like the choral functions in Elizabethan drama.



๐ŸŽญ Performances That Echo Shakespearean Depth


Saif Ali Khan’s Langda Tyagi is a revelation — his performance as a bitter, scheming villain is both menacing and deeply human. Ajay Devgn’s brooding Omkara and Kareena’s vulnerable Dolly bring emotional intensity without melodrama.


Much like Othello, Omkara ends in bloodshed and self-destruction — a grim reminder of how mistrust and manipulation can erode love and loyalty. But Bhardwaj’s version never feels like a carbon copy; it’s a reinvention that respects the original while carving its own cultural identity.


✨ Final Verdict


Omkara is more than just a Shakespearean adaptation — it's a brilliant cultural translation. Bhardwaj doesn’t merely transport Othello to India; he transforms it, embedding its themes in Indian realities like casteism, regional politics, and patriarchal values. The result is a film that feels timeless and timely — a tragedy that bridges Elizabethan England and modern India.


Reference

Chat GPT

Google

Dr. Dilip barad blogger.com 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab Activitry (20th century )

The Drama Of Kingdom ' MACBETH '